So here’s part of our story so far . . .
My husband proposed to me on a bridge overlooking a river
that runs through what used to be a golf course in our old neighborhood.
The bridge rotted away because the river kept flooding and
it eventually had to be torn down. At
the time, I had actually thought about preserving a piece of wood from the
bridge, but heaven only knows what disgusting things were on its boards.
Speaking of disgusting, about a year later, we got married
by a beloved priest whom everyone adored . . .except the children he was sexually
abusing (we didn’t know about it, of course.)
So then we moved into our first apartment, in the building
where we first met. Yes, I literally
married the boy next door. I met him the
day he moved into his apartment.
A number of years
later, after we had long-settled elsewhere, our apartment burned down.
So our bridge rotted, our priest turned out to be a
pedophile, and our apartment burned down.
Geesh. I wonder what
the future might hold.
But seriously, the good news is that this year we celebrated
37 years together. Like I told my
husband, the glue has stuck, even in spite of the trail of destruction left in
our wake, none of which was our doing, of course!
Now you may be wondering if our marriage was valid so many
years ago if our priest was in a state of mortal sin. Do his horrific offenses affect the
sacrament?
The following excerpt is a good summation of whether the sacrament’s
validity is affected. I would encourage,
though, you to read the entire, short explanation found here:
“With respect to the intention required for the valid
administration and reception (by an adult) of the sacraments, the Council of
Trent requires only that the minister or subject intend to do at least what the
Church does.
This is a fairly minimum intention and means that a sacrament would be valid even if a minister lacked faith in the sacrament, or were in a state of mortal sin. It is enough for him to intend to do what the Church does when administrating this sacrament. This refers only to the intention; some sacraments, such as matrimony and hearing confessions, have additional requirements for validity such as formal authorization or proper canonical procedures.”
This is a fairly minimum intention and means that a sacrament would be valid even if a minister lacked faith in the sacrament, or were in a state of mortal sin. It is enough for him to intend to do what the Church does when administrating this sacrament. This refers only to the intention; some sacraments, such as matrimony and hearing confessions, have additional requirements for validity such as formal authorization or proper canonical procedures.”
Basically, the priest’s intention makes the sacrament valid,
because, as it says in the summation article, “St. Thomas Aquinas says: Christ
may act even through a minister who is spiritually dead.”
God is so great, he can work beyond the sins of his people. I guess that might be a good reason for
staying with a battle-scarred church as the Catholic Church has notably become.
You see, the Sacrament of the Eucharist, where Christ is
made present under the appearance of bread and wine, is the gift Jesus himself
left the Church at the Last Supper. He
didn’t leave a symbol of himself, he gave his very self. It is what we continue
to celebrate today at every Catholic Mass.
The truth is, there isn’t one disgusting, unimaginable sin
that could be performed by the people or leaders of his Church that could cause
me to walk away from Jesus in the Eucharist.
He is so much greater than all that.
Janet Cassidy
Janetcassidy.blogspot.com
Janetcassidy.blubrry.com
No comments:
Post a Comment